The approaching precipice

Lest you wonder why I was confident enough to take such a firm position with the title of the new book:

This OCC and OTS Mortgage Metrics Report for the second quarter of 2009 provides performance data on first lien residential mortgages serviced by national banks and federally regulated thrifts. The report covers all types of first lien mortgages serviced by most of the industry’s largest mortgage servicers, whose loans make up approximately 64 percent of all mortgages outstanding in the United States. The report covers nearly 34 million loans totaling almost $6 trillion in principal balances and provides information on their performance through the end of the second quarter of 2009 (June 30, 2009)….

The percentage of current and performing mortgages in the portfolio decreased by 1.4 percent from the previous quarter to 88.6 percent of all mortgages in the portfolio. All categories of delinquencies increased from the previous quarter, with serious delinquencies—loans 60 or more days past due and loans to delinquent bankrupt borrowers—reaching 5.3 percent of all mortgages in the portfolio, an increase of 11.5 percent from the previous quarter. Foreclosures in process reached 2.9 percent of all mortgages, a 16.2 percent increase.

First, keep in mind that “The subprime losses of $150 billion in 2007 required US government aid of $13.2 trillion as of 19 June 2009”. Now, do the math reported above. 88.6 percent of the $6 trillion in mortgages are current. 11.4 percent representing $684 billion are not. Some of those late mortgages will cure, but most will not. Assuming that the 36 percent of mortgages not represented in the report reflect similar percentages, that indicates potential defaults in the realm of $1.1 trillion dollars assuming that the default rate does not continue to rise. The chart below indicates that this is unlikely. Since average losses on foreclosures are reported as $45,000 (Banker & Tradesman) and $60,000 (Freddie Mac), this indicates an average loss per mortgage of around 30 percent, which means that the banking system will have to absorb at least another $330 billion in losses, of which $81 billion is already in process even if no more homeowners fall behind on their mortgages!

Friedman addresses the wrong audience

But why let a chance to wax dramatic about the possibility of an assassination go by?

Sometimes I wonder whether George H.W. Bush, president “41,” will be remembered as our last “legitimate” president. The right impeached Bill Clinton and hounded him from Day 1 with the bogus Whitewater “scandal.” George W. Bush was elected under a cloud because of the Florida voting mess, and his critics on the left never let him forget it.

And Mr. Obama is now having his legitimacy attacked by a concerted campaign from the right fringe. They are using everything from smears that he is a closet “socialist” to calling him a “liar” in the middle of a joint session of Congress to fabricating doubts about his birth in America and whether he is even a citizen. And these attacks are not just coming from the fringe. Now they come from Lou Dobbs on CNN and from members of the House of Representatives.

Again, hack away at the man’s policies and even his character all you want. I know politics is a tough business. But if we destroy the legitimacy of another president to lead or to pull the country together for what most Americans want most right now — nation-building at home — we are in serious trouble. We can’t go 24 years without a legitimate president — not without being swamped by the problems that we will end up postponing because we can’t address them rationally.

The only questions about Obama’s legitimacy are those result of Obama hiding his records. Obama could end the questions about his legitimacy in about five minutes; if Friedman is genuinely worried about the issue, he should join Joseph Farah and Lou Dobbs in demanding the complete release of all records that are even remotely relevant to it.

The cold reality is that despite all their hand-wringing about potential dangers to Obama, there are few things the American Left would like better than to see him become a martyr to the cause. It’s already apparent that as president, Obama will be an ongoing series of political disasters for the Left for another three years and possibly seven. But as a martyr, he would be useful for generations.

Friedman’s disingenuousness is highlighted by Jonah Goldberg, who points out the irony of a fan of Chinese communist autocracy feigning concern about American liberal democracy.

The FDIC can’t borrow solvency

I’ve been repeatedly asserting that the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund has run dry, while most economic sites have been insisting that the running DIF balance doesn’t actually matter because the FDIC has access to the $500 billion credit line with the Treasury established in May. That argument never quite made sense to me. Someone who is bankrupt is still bankrupt even if someone else promises to lend him more money, because taking that loan would only increase his liabilities and put him in a worse position than before.

This statement from the FDIC yesterday should settle the matter:

An alternative—borrowing from the Treasury or the Federal Financing Bank (FFB)— would also increase the liquid assets available to fund future resolutions but would not increase the Fund balance as there would be a corresponding liability recorded. Nevertheless, the FDIC has several options for returning the reserve ratio to the statutorily mandated 1.15 percent and meeting its liquidity needs.
Restoration Plan and Assessment Rates Staff projects that failures will peak in 2009 and 2010 and that industry earnings will have recovered sufficiently by 2011 to absorb a 3 basis point increase in deposit insurance assessments. Adopting a uniform increase in assessment rates of 3 basis points now, effective January 1, 2011, should ensure that the prepaid assessments would address current liquidity needs without materially impairing the capital or earnings of insured institutions. Advance adoption of the rate increase also should help institutions plan for future assessment expenses….

In staff’s view, requiring that institutions prepay assessments is also preferable to borrowing from the U.S. Treasury or the Federal Financing Bank (FFB). Prepayment of assessments ensures that the deposit insurance system remains directly industry-funded. Additionally, staff believes that, unlike borrowing from the Treasury or the FFB, requiring prepaid assessments would not count toward the public debt limit. Finally, collecting prepaid assessments would be the least costly option to the Fund for raising liquidity as there would be no interest cost.

In other words, the FDIC is doing essentially the same thing as Cash for Clunkers and every other federal stimulus program by spending tomorrow’s cash today in the hopes that it will allow them to survive long enough until the recovery magically begins. They’re gambling that $77 billion in cash and liquid assets will be enough to get them through 2009 and 2010.

Of course, this strategy is predicated on the worst case being the “jobless recovery” scenario. These reserve ratio projections from mid-2007 should demonstrate the precision and reliability of their forecasts – their worst case scenario for 2009 was 1.18 percent vs 0.27 percent for last quarter. And given that they’ve already blown through at least $45 billion in the first half of 2009 alone, (they admit to $25 billion in the report, but the FDIC Quarterly shows otherwise), I expect that even with three years of pre-paid assessments, the DIF will run dry again before the third quarter of 2010. Notice that the requirement to return the DIF to the statutorily mandated minimum reserve ratio of 1.15 percent has been increased twice in seven months, giving them eight years just to get back to normal. And notice that they’re announcing their intention to hide the data henceforth because the DIF as previously calculated is empty and the reserve ratio is negative.

Near the end of the third and fourth quarters of 2009, if there is a reasonable possibility that the reserve ratio has declined to a level that could undermine public confidence in federal deposit insurance or to a level which shall be close to or below zero, staff will estimate the reserve ratio for that quarter from available data on, or estimates of, insurance fund assessment income, investment income, operating expenses, other revenue and expenses, and loss provisions (including provisions for anticipated failures).

On a tangential note, there’s some evidence that the loss-share deals the FDIC is striking with banks that are acquiring the asserts of failed banks are driving up foreclosure rates, thus putting more downward pressure on housing prices. And if that’s not bad enough, Denninger is now calculating that the entire banking system is insolvent, since it faces the absorption of a conservatively estimated $869 billion in single-family mortgage defaults alone.

“The entire banking system and likely The Fed, given the quantity of Fannie and Freddie paper it has been and is “eating”, is insolvent. These facts are why the government is lying – they’re well-aware of the near-zero cure rates and know that these facts mean that the banking industry has nowhere near sufficient capital to withstand these losses without folding like a paper cup getting stomped on by an elephant. (Remember that these numbers do not include any commercial real estate losses and we have found that banks are frequently over-stating their claimed values for these loans by 50% or more – as was seen with Colonial.)”

Launch Party!


If this doesn’t establish Linux on the desktop, nothing will. The funniest thing is that two days after sending me the link to this video, Big Chilly was invited to a real Windows 7 launch party! Microsoft is really terrible at this sort of thing… everyone knows that a genuinely vibrant advertisement would have included a gay Asian and a fat, but funny Hispanic.

Kill him now, Chilliette. It would be kinder.